Supabase vs Firebase: Which Backend Platform is Right for Your Project?

As a developer who’s built and tested countless apps, I know the rush of starting a new project—and the headache of picking the right backend. Supabase and Firebase are two powerhouse Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms that take the pain out of managing databases, user logins, storage, and more, so you can focus on crafting an awesome front end for your web or mobile app. They both deliver the core tools you need, but their approaches, pricing, and strengths are worlds apart.

In this detailed guide, I’ll break down Supabase vs Firebase in plain, no-nonsense terms, sharing insights from their features, costs, and real-world performance to help you choose the best fit for your project. Whether you’re just starting out or have years of code under your belt, this article’s got practical advice to make your decision a breeze.

What is Firebase?

Firebase, owned by Google, is a mature BaaS platform that helps developers build apps quickly. Launched as a real-time database in 2011 and acquired by Google in 2014, it has evolved into a comprehensive backend solution. Firebase is best known for its NoSQL databases (Firestore and Realtime Database), which excel at handling unstructured data and real-time updates, making it a favorite for mobile apps.

Key Features of Firebase

• Firestore and Realtime Database: NoSQL databases that sync data instantly across devices, ideal for apps like chats, live dashboards, or gaming leaderboards.
• Authentication: Supports email/password, social logins (Google, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, etc.), phone authentication, and anonymous logins.
• Cloud Functions: Run custom code on Google’s servers, triggered by database changes or HTTP requests, with support for multiple languages (Node.js, Python, Go).
• Storage: Store and serve files like images or videos, backed by Google Cloud Storage.
• Analytics: Built-in tools to track user behavior, app crashes, and custom events, with Google Analytics integration.
• Push Notifications: Send targeted messages to mobile app users.
• Google Ecosystem: Seamless integration with Google Cloud, AdMob, BigQuery, and AI tools like Vertex AI.
• Firebase Studio & Genkit: Tools for AI app development, leveraging Google’s Gemini models.

Firebase is battle-tested, with a polished dashboard and extensive documentation, making it a go-to for developers who need a fully managed, mobile-friendly backend with extras like analytics and notifications.

What is Supabase?

Supabase is an open-source alternative to Firebase, launched in 2020. Built on PostgreSQL, a powerful relational database that uses SQL, Supabase offers similar BaaS features but emphasizes transparency, developer control, and SQL familiarity. It’s designed for those who prefer structured data and want the flexibility to self-host or avoid vendor lock-in.

Key Features of Supabase

• PostgreSQL Database: A relational database supporting complex queries, joins, JSON, and vector datatypes (pgvector) for AI use cases.
• Authentication: Offers email/password, magic links, social logins (Google, GitHub, Discord, LinkedIn), and multi-factor authentication (MFA) via Twilio, with Row Level Security (RLS) for granular access control.
• Real-time Subscriptions: Listen to database changes instantly using Postgres’ replication features.
• Storage: Manage files like images or videos with CDN support and easy APIs.
• Edge Functions: Lightweight serverless functions running on Deno (TypeScript/JavaScript), deployed at the edge for low latency.
• Open-Source: Host Supabase yourself (e.g., on AWS, Docker) or use their cloud service, avoiding vendor lock-in.
• Auto-generated APIs: Instant REST and GraphQL APIs for your database.
• AI Integrations: Native vector search (pgvector) and support for OpenAI, Hugging Face, and LangChain.

Supabase is newer but growing rapidly (over 450,000 developers and 58,000 GitHub stars as of May 2025), with a focus on SQL, scalability, and open-source flexibility.

Supabase vs Firebase: Head-to-Head Comparison

Let’s compare Supabase and Firebase across key areas, with a deep dive into pricing and features, to help you choose the right platform for your project.

1. Database Type

Firebase:

• Type: NoSQL (Firestore and Realtime Database).
• Firestore: Document-based, scalable, supports complex queries but struggles with relational joins. Charges per read/write/delete.
• Realtime Database: JSON-based, optimized for low-latency sync, limited to 1 MB/record. Charges by data transfer.
• Use Case: Unstructured data, real-time apps (e.g., chats, collaborative tools).
• Limitations: Complex queries require denormalization, increasing costs. No SQL support.

Supabase:

• Type: PostgreSQL (relational SQL).
• Features: Supports complex queries, joins, JSON, and vector datatypes (pgvector). Auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIs.
• Use Case: Structured data, relational apps (e.g., e-commerce, finance).
• Limitations: Less optimized for unstructured data compared to NoSQL.

Winner: Supabase for relational data and complex queries; Firebase for flexible, unstructured data and real-time sync.

2. Authentication

Firebase:

• Methods: Email/password, social logins (Google, Facebook, Apple, Twitter, etc.), phone, anonymous login, account deletion.
• Security: Firebase Security Rules tie authentication to data access, easy for simple cases but less granular than SQL-based rules.
• Cost: Free for most methods; phone authentication costs $0.01–$0.06/verification after 10,000 users.
• Strengths: Broad provider support, seamless mobile integration.

Supabase:

• Methods: Email/password, magic links, social logins (Google, GitHub, Discord, LinkedIn, Slack), MFA via Twilio.
• Security: Row Level Security (RLS) for granular database access, using SQL-based rules tied to user IDs.
• Cost: Free for unlimited users in Free/Pro tiers; $0.00325/MAU after 100,000 in Pro.
• Strengths: RLS is powerful for SQL apps, MFA support included.

You can read: Understanding Supabase Auth: A Simple Guide for Beginners

Winner: Tie. Firebase excels for mobile apps with phone authentication; Supabase shines with RLS and MFA for SQL-based apps.

3. Real-Time Capabilities

Firebase:

• Features: Firestore and Realtime Database offer mature real-time sync, ideal for chats or live dashboards. Supports offline resilience.
• Cost: Charged per read (Firestore) or data transfer (Realtime Database).
• Strengths: Battle-tested, mobile-optimized, seamless sync.

Supabase:

• Features: Postgres Changes (real-time subscriptions) streams database updates. Supports 500–5,000 concurrent connections (Free/Pro).
• Cost: Included in transfer quota ($0.09/GB after limits).
• Strengths: SQL-based, server-driven consistency.
• Limitations: Less mature, connection limits may require upgrades.

Winner: Firebase for maturity and mobile support; Supabase is strong for SQL-based real-time apps.

4. Serverless Functions

Firebase:

• Cloud Functions: Supports Node.js, Python, Go, Java, etc. Triggered by database changes, HTTP requests, or schedules.
• Cost: $0.40/million invocations, plus compute time ($0.0026/GB-second, $0.026/CPU-second).
• Strengths: Multi-language support, Google Cloud integration.

Supabase:

• Edge Functions: Runs on Deno (TypeScript/JavaScript), deployed at the edge for low latency. Direct PostgreSQL access.
• Cost: 500,000 invocations free, then pay-as-you-go compute ($10/100 hours).
• Strengths: Lightweight, database-aware, fast.
• Limitations: Limited to TypeScript/JavaScript.

Winner: Firebase for language variety and ecosystem integration; Supabase for low-latency, database-heavy tasks.

5. Pricing Model

Pricing is a critical factor, as it affects your project’s budget and scalability. Firebase and Supabase have distinct approaches, with Firebase being usage-based and Supabase offering tiered subscriptions.

Firebase Pricing

Firebase uses a pay-as-you-go model with a generous free tier. Costs depend on usage (reads, writes, storage, etc.), which can be unpredictable for high-traffic apps.

Free Tier (Spark Plan):

Database:

• Firestore: 50,000 reads/day, 20,000 writes/day, 20,000 deletes/day, 1 GB stored.
• Realtime Database: 100 simultaneous connections, 1 GB stored, 10 GB downloaded/month.
• Authentication: 10,000 monthly active users (MAUs); phone auth costs after 10,000.
• Storage: 1 GB stored, 10 GB downloaded/month.
• Cloud Functions: 125,000 invocations/month, 40,000 GB-seconds, 40,000 CPU-seconds.
• Other: Free hosting (10 GB storage, 10 GB transfer/month), basic analytics, push notifications.
• Projects: Unlimited projects.

Paid Tier (Blaze Plan):

Database:

• Firestore: $0.06/100,000 reads, $0.18/100,000 writes, $0.09/100,000 deletes, $0.108/GB stored.
• Realtime Database: $5/GB stored, $1/GB downloaded.
• Storage: $0.026/GB stored, $0.12/GB downloaded.
• Cloud Functions: $0.40/million invocations, plus compute costs.
• Egress: $0.12/GB for data transferred out (free within Google Cloud).
• Additional Costs: Phone authentication, advanced analytics, Firebase ML, or A/B testing.

Key Notes:

• Unpredictable Costs: High read/write volumes (e.g., 100,000 reads/day = ~$6/day) can lead to high bills.
• Scalability: Automatic scaling, backed by Google’s infrastructure.
• Example: A chat app with 100,000 daily reads and 50,000 writes costs ~$9/day on Firestore, excluding storage or egress.

Supabase Pricing

Supabase uses a tiered subscription model with predictable pricing based on storage, compute, and users. It also supports self-hosting for full cost control.

Free Tier:

• Database: 500 MB storage, unlimited API requests, 2 GB transfer/month.
• Authentication: 10,000 MAUs (no extra cost for more users in free tier).
• Storage: 1 GB storage, 2 GB transfer/month.
• Edge Functions: 500,000 invocations/month.
• Realtime: 500 concurrent peak connections, 250 GB transfer/month.
• Projects: 2 free projects; pauses after 7 days of inactivity.
• Other: RLS, REST/GraphQL APIs, pgvector for AI.

Paid Tiers:

Pro Plan ($25/month + optional pay-as-you-go):

• Database: 8 GB storage, unlimited API requests, 250 GB transfer/month.
• Authentication: 100,000 MAUs included, $0.00325/additional MAU.
• Storage: 100 GB storage, 250 GB transfer/month.
• Realtime: 5,000 concurrent peak connections, $10/1,000 additional connections.
• Edge Functions: 500,000 invocations/month.
• Pay-as-you-go Add-ons:
• Storage: $0.125/GB stored, $0.09/GB transferred.
• Compute: $10/100 hours.
• Spend Cap: Set limits to control costs.

Team Plan ($599/month):

• 250 GB storage, 1 TB transfer, 1M MAUs, priority support.

Enterprise: Custom pricing for large-scale apps.

• Self-Hosting:
  • Host on AWS, Docker, etc., with costs based on infrastructure (e.g., $10–$100/month for small setups).
  • No usage-based fees, ideal for DevOps-savvy teams.
• Key Notes:
  • Predictable Costs: Charges based on storage/compute, not API calls. Unlimited API requests are a major advantage.
  • Scalability: Scales well for relational data; high-traffic real-time apps may need connection upgrades.
  • Example: A web app with 50,000 MAUs and 10 GB storage costs $25/month (Pro Plan), with no API or auth fees.

Pricing Summary

Firebase:

• Pros: Generous free tier, unlimited projects, no upfront costs.
• Cons: Per-operation charges (reads/writes) can lead to high costs for high-traffic apps.
• Best For: Prototyping, small projects, or low-traffic apps.

Supabase:

• Pros: Predictable pricing, unlimited API requests, cheaper storage/transfer, self-hosting option.
• Cons: Limited free projects (2), pauses inactive projects, real-time connection limits.
• Best For: Database-heavy apps, predictable scaling, or self-hosting.

Winner: Supabase for cost predictability and unlimited API calls; Firebase’s free tier is better for prototyping.

6. Storage

Firebase:

• Features: Store files (images, videos, PDFs) with Google Cloud Storage backend. Scalable, mobile-friendly.
• Cost: $0.026/GB stored, $0.12/GB downloaded.
• Strengths: Mature, integrates with Cloud Functions.

Supabase:

• Features: File storage with CDN support, tied to PostgreSQL for metadata.
• Cost: $0.125/GB stored, $0.09/GB transferred (cheaper egress).
• Strengths: Cheaper transfer, open-source flexibility.

Winner: Supabase for lower egress costs; Firebase for maturity.

7. Analytics

Firebase:

• Features: Built-in analytics for user engagement, demographics, funnels, and custom events. Integrates with Google Analytics.
• Cost: Free for basic analytics; advanced features may incur costs.
• Strengths: Comprehensive, mobile-focused.

Supabase:

• Features: No built-in analytics. Requires third-party tools (e.g., PostHog, Mixpanel).
• Cost: Free (external tool costs apply).
• Strengths: Flexible integrations.
• Limitations: No native solution.

Winner: Firebase for native analytics; Supabase relies on external tools.

8. AI and Vector Support

Firebase:

• Features: Firebase Studio and Genkit for AI apps, Vertex AI for Gemini models (text, image, video).
• Cost: Varies by Google Cloud usage.
• Strengths: Deep Google AI integration.

Supabase:

• Features: pgvector for vector similarity search, integrations with OpenAI, Hugging Face, LangChain. Semantic search support.
• Cost: Included in database storage.
• Strengths: Database-native, open-source AI tools.

Winner: Supabase for database-native AI; Firebase for Google’s AI ecosystem.

9. Open-Source vs Proprietary

• Firebase: Proprietary, Google-controlled. No self-hosting, leading to vendor lock-in.
• Supabase: Open-source, self-hostable (AWS, Docker). No lock-in, full control.
• Winner: Supabase for flexibility and transparency.

10. Developer Experience

• Firebase: Polished dashboard, extensive documentation, and mature SDKs, especially for mobile (iOS/Android). NoSQL can be tricky for complex queries, and security rules are less intuitive than SQL.
• Supabase: Sleek dashboard, good documentation, and easy-to-use supabase-js library. SQL familiarity simplifies querying, but some features (e.g., edge functions) are in beta.
• Winner: Firebase for maturity and mobile support; Supabase for SQL intuitiveness.

11. Community and Ecosystem

• Firebase: Massive community (6.44% of developers vs. 2.77% for Supabase), tons of tutorials, and integrations with Crashlytics, AdMob, and BigQuery.
• Supabase: Growing community, strong support for Next.js, Flutter, and open-source tools.
• Winner: Firebase for its mature ecosystem; Supabase’s community is vibrant for open-source fans.

When to Choose Firebase

Firebase is the better choice if:

• Your app is mobile-first (iOS/Android) and needs push notifications, analytics, or phone authentication.
• You want a NoSQL database for unstructured data (e.g., chat apps, real-time games).
• You’re in the Google ecosystem and need integrations with Google Cloud, AdMob, or Vertex AI.
• You prioritize rapid prototyping and a mature platform with extensive documentation.
• You’re okay with vendor lock-in and usage-based costs.

Example Use Case: A mobile social networking app with real-time chat, push notifications, and analytics.

When to Choose Supabase

Supabase is the better choice if:

• Your app needs a relational database for structured data and complex queries (e.g., e-commerce, finance apps).
• You prefer SQL and tools like Row Level Security for granular access control.
• You value open-source flexibility and want to self-host or avoid vendor lock-in.
• You need predictable pricing and unlimited API requests.
• You’re building with modern frameworks like Next.js or Flutter and want a lightweight backend.

Example Use Case: A web-based e-commerce platform with user profiles, product catalogs, and order tracking.

Real-World Insights

Developers on X share practical experiences:

• Firebase: Praised for its quick setup and mobile SDKs, with costs as low as a few cents for low-traffic apps. However, some find its NoSQL structure limiting for relational data and complain about high costs at scale due to read/write charges.
• Supabase: Loved for its Postgres support and predictable pricing, with unlimited API calls being a major win. Some note its real-time features and documentation feel less polished than Firebase’s.

Case Studies:

• A developer scaled an AI app to $1M in revenue in five months using Supabase, citing its cost-effectiveness, SQL flexibility, and pgvector for AI features.
• Firebase powers mobile apps with millions of users, like gaming or social platforms, due to its mature SDKs, real-time sync, and analytics.

Conclusion

Both Supabase and Firebase are powerful BaaS platforms, but they cater to different needs. Firebase is ideal for mobile apps, rapid prototyping, and developers who want a mature, Google-backed ecosystem with features like analytics and push notifications. Its usage-based pricing suits small projects but can get expensive at scale. Supabase excels for relational data, SQL enthusiasts, and teams prioritizing open-source flexibility and predictable costs. Its unlimited API requests and self-hosting option make it a cost-effective choice for database-heavy apps.

To choose, ask yourself:

• Data Needs: Do I need NoSQL for flexibility or SQL for structured data?
• Platform Focus: Is my app mobile-first or web-based?
• Budget: Can I handle usage-based costs, or do I need predictable pricing?
• Control: Do I want a fully managed solution or open-source freedom?

Try their free tiers to test which platform feels right for your project. Both Supabase and Firebase streamline backend development, letting you focus on building an awesome app that users will love.

Tags: Supabase vs Firebase, backend platform comparison, NoSQL vs SQL, open-source backend, mobile app development

Related posts:

Types of Storage Management Systems: Optimizing Your Data Infrastructure ClonBrowser: A Simple Guide to a Safe, Antidetect Browser for Managing Multiple Accounts 10 Best Database Software For Small Business How AI Makes Backing Up and Recovering Your Data Easier and Safer AWS S3 Alternatives: A Comprehensive Guide to Cloud Storage Solutions Mobile Proxies vs. Residential Proxies: What’s the Difference? Understanding Supabase Auth: A Simple Guide for Beginners SQL vs. NoSQL: Which Database Is Right for Your Needs?